Help CD

Portfolio trust and coverage

Compare initiatives on trust, risk and evidence. Higher trust is better.

Attestation reports
Average trust score
51 / 100
5 of 5 initiatives scored
High or Critical risk
2
ARA overall residual
Evidence coverage
76%
Average across assessed initiatives
Committee time saved
30h
About $4,500, illustrative

Trust score distribution

Number of initiatives in each trust range

Critical (0-24)
1
Low (25-49)
1
Medium (50-74)
2
High (75-100)
1
Not available (CALIBRE-only)
0

Governance coverage

Across the whole portfolio

Initiatives scored
100%
Full assessment
100%
Evidence coverage
76%
Actions closed
0%

Initiative comparison

InitiativeTrust scoreARA residualBandEvidenceNext review
Autonomous personal-loan approval (Australia)
SAMPLE-01
39
 High Critical 78% -
AI-assisted AML transaction monitoring
SAMPLE-02
58
 Medium High 85% -
HR policy RAG chatbot (global workforce)
SAMPLE-03
80
 Low Moderate 92% -
Autonomous SOC response agent
SAMPLE-04
19
 Critical Critical 45% -
Radiology AI triage assistant (hospital)
SAMPLE-05
59
 Medium High 80% -
How the trust score is calculated

Trust score = 0.40 × (100 - ARA residual) + 0.30 × (100 - CALIBRE GII) + 0.30 × evidence coverage. Range 0 to 100.

ARA residual maps Low 15, Medium 45, High 75, Critical 95. The GII used is never below the lower limit of the final band (Moderate 26, High 51, Critical 76), so a system raised by a floor or amplifier is not scored as if it were in its lower band. When no regulations need evidence, the other two weights are rescaled.

It is not calculated for a CALIBRE-only quick assessment, because there is no ARA residual. Run the full assessment to get one.